Now taking design partners

Small legal practices

Non-litigation work — conveyancing, wills and estates, small commercial. The profession where the most is already built.

The job we would time first

One inbound document, end to end

Every design partner times the same shape of job, varying only the profession. That is deliberate: it tests whether the mechanism saves time independently of industry, which is a more useful thing to learn than two data points in one profession.

  • Contract review and clause risk
  • Client correspondence
  • Matter document summaries
  • Engagement and retainer drafting
  • File note capture
  1. A contract or client document arrives
  2. Someone reads it for the clauses that matter
  3. Details that should not be sent are taken out by hand
  4. A summary or reply is drafted
  5. A solicitor approves it before it goes
  6. The matter file gets updated, or does not

How it lands here

What this looks like in your practice

Contract intake, clause extraction, a risk summary, and a solicitor approving the result before it goes anywhere — with the approval step declared in the workflow rather than left to whoever happens to be driving.

This is the profession where the most is already built: two legal workflow packages ship, and the contract-risk path was designed around a solicitor's sign-off from the start.

Court-facing work is out of scope. Australian courts have their own rules about generative AI in affidavits, witness statements and expert reports, and this is not the tool for that. We stay on the non-litigation side of the line.

In your regulator's words

What has already been said about this

Quoted from the published documents, with dates and links. We have not summarised them for you, and none of this is us telling you what your obligations are.

any placing of client confidential information into a publicly available generative AI system is akin to putting it in the public domain. This is likely to be a breach of confidentiality and clients may lose privilege.

The Law Society of New South WalesA Solicitor's Guide to Responsible Use of Artificial IntelligenceJanuary 2026, page 6, on rule 9Applies to: Solicitors in New South Wales

Implementing clear, risk-based policies to minimise data and security breaches, and set out what AI tools they have decided to use in their practice, who can use those tools, for what purposes, and with what information.

The Law Society of NSW, the Legal Practice Board of Western Australia, and the Victorian Legal Services Board and CommissionerStatement on the use of artificial intelligence in Australian legal practice6 December 2024Applies to: Legal practitioners in New South Wales, Victoria and Western Australia

consider maintaining records of each generative AI output for discovery and retention purposes.

The Law Society of New South WalesA Solicitor's Guide to Responsible Use of Artificial IntelligenceJanuary 2026, page 9, post-adoption checklistApplies to: Solicitors in New South WalesFramed as a consideration in a checklist, not as a requirement.

Read all of it, across every profession

Interface design for contract review workflow, shown with invented sample data
Contract review workflow. Interface design, invented sample data.

One job, defined once

Bring one job your practice repeats

Thirty minutes, no software shown, and a one-page write-up of that job whether or not you take it further.

Book a workflow map